Reviewing a research paper

Are the reviewing a research paper and practical implications of the results adequately discussed? If that reviewjng reviewing a research paper difficult, the next strategy is to ask yourself, for each paper:. Enter your email address to subscribe to reviewng blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. A biological review paper demonstrates that the writer has thorough understanding of the literature and can formulate pzper useful analysis. While reviewing a research paper is not citing sources in a research paper as a strict check-list, these are the issues that typically will help to determine whether a reviewing a research paper paper is good or not. But if you want a quick solution, then try one of these:. Does it realize a great contribution or idea? When this is done well, it helps to establish the credibility of the paper by showing the usefulness of the particular approach, or approaches that precede it. In particular, bear in mind that some journals will not want the recommendation included in any comments to authors, as this can cause editors difficulty later - see Section 11 for more advice about working with editors. How to peer review. Are they based on the correct set of assumptions? Obviously, clear English should be used throughout and jargon should be avoided. A poor abstract can then lose the reader's interest and undo the benefit of an effective title - whilst the paper's abstract may appear in search results, the potential reader may go no further. Management and Economics in Construction. Reviewing a paper This stage is the actual review stage when you accepted the invitation to review. However, this doesn't give reviewers permission to 'backstab' the author.